As I write this, a program about the contemporary world of installation art (or "bollocks," as it's often known) is airing. This follows a bunch of preening, self-satisfied pseuds inspecting the wares of new talents as the latter hope like hell to be discovered, and the former sit there swelling noticeably with ego fuelled glee. It's like watching gigantically conceited people sitting on various sides of the "in/out" divide, where one makes the other dance. In fact, that's exactly what it is.
The works of art in question are of dubious quality. The following examples are not made up.
One involved a handwritten copy of War and Peace (and no, the 'artist' wasn't pretending to have written it - I was rather hoping he would). This was mystifying. Having written the whole book out by hand, onto more than 2,100 pages, what was this inventive buffoon going to do? Eat it? Memorise it? Engrave the Houses of Parliament with an image of him grabbing his wrist in agony? Shove it up his arse?
No. The artistic part was .... copying out somebody else's book, one of the most famous and notoriously difficult to read ever written. This was his piece of art. Talk about a let down. No chance of him chewing it up into spit balls and firing out of his nostrils at passing clowns that have set on fire by enraged tabloid readers who mistook them for immigrants? Nah. Shame.
If that sets the tone for the level of trivial, dull and self-regardingly flatulent offerings, we're in for a fun hour.
One enterprising lass had positioned a branch, held back in place by traffic sign supports and hovering over several rolls of toilet paper, which was dyed yellow. I mean ... words fail me. I'd remind you that these are genuine examples of this level of free fall "anything I pull out of my arse is art" school of thought.
Somebody else made a display out of folding chairs, putting them in a circle. On the floor. By hand. This was his statement on ...
This spectacle was in aid of Charles Saatchi's art collection. Saatchi is an advertising mogul (ie, cunt) who specialises in paying a fortune for weird and silly tat that has a few desperately self regarding dullards cooing in glee, while the rest of the world is staggered at the gall of claiming a crate full of tinsel is in any way art.
A visual installation artist - in this case some bloke with a camcorder and a lot of cheek - is quoted here on making a piece about his father:
" ... I filmed him for a bit but he didn't really do a lot ... he was just sat there, Googling affordable property in North Yorkshire ..." Okay ....
One of the phrases that is cropping up a lot in this navel gazing TV show is, "Tell me why it's art?" Some wannabe with all the trappings of oily self regard (silly glasses, daft beard stylings, hair that looks like a goat has ram-raided the back of his head and got stuck) responded with this stunning reply: "Tell me why it's not art?"
I'll tell you what art is. Art is any activity where the quality of the work is the main reason for doing it. So anything done to a high standard, with that as its main goal, is art. I know. I looked it up once while some similar type of show was on, when people dribbled on about the whole art debate.
Another random quote: "I'm surprised it's not a better drawing ..." In other words, the feller can't draw very well. Or at least his style is not conventionally good. Or something.
The whole "new" school of art has been debated endlessly. At the end of the day, I can see the point of some of these pieces - Hirst's shark suspended in formaldehyde is a daring idea - but a lot of it is just pretentious twaddle.
I raise this subject because the more observant of you will have noticed two new side bars, just to the right of this, advertising books of incredibly high quality (mine). This daring neophyte installation is the work of a newish name in the art world, one Mr
Lobo, a groundbreaking talent whose commitment to his craft is such that he spent over four years painstakingly hand-crafting these images from lumps of finest Italian pixel, blessed by the Pope and unblessed again by Mr Terence Worthing of Flixton.
The enormity of effort and commitment these images represent is a bold new statement on the direction of web art the upcoming new decade has to offer. My thanks and a cheque for $400,000 has been sent to Mr Lobo, who is even now reclining exhausted on his artist's couch.
The originals are of course in the Louvre, guarded by savage Parisians wishing to preserve their timeless beauty and face-achingly gorgeous appearance.
Thanks Lobo!